# ARIMA modeling for time series analysis in STATA

By Priya Chetty and Divya Dhuria on March 20, 2018

In the previous article, all possibilities for performing Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) modeling for the time series GDP were identified as under.

 S. No ARIMA 1 (1,1,1) 2 (1,1,2) 3 (1,1,3) 4 (1,1,4) 5 (1,1,5) 6 (1,1,6) 7 (1,2,1) 8 (4,2,1) 9 (9,2,1)

Table 1: ARIMA models as per ACF and PACF graphs.

## Testing ARIMA models in STATA for time series analysis

The present article tests all these ARIMA models and identifies the appropriate one for the process of forecasting time series GDP. To start with testing ARIMA models in STATA:

1. Click on ‘Statistics’ in the ribbon
2. Click on ‘time-series’
3. Select ‘ARIMA and ARMAX models’ (Figure 1 below)

## Test 1: ARIMA (1,1,1)

A dialogue box will appear as shown in the figure below. Here fill four important options to carry out ARIMA testing. First, select the time series variable fitting the ARIMA model. In the present case, the time series variable is GDP. Therefore select ‘gdp’ in the ‘Dependent variable’ option. Second, record the ARIMA model specifications estimated in the previous article. Therefore for the first ARIMA model, (1, 1, 1) (Table 1 above), select ‘1’ in ‘Autoregressive order (p)’, ‘1’ in ‘Integrated order (d)’, and ‘1’ in ‘Moving-average order (q)’.

After selecting the values for ARIMA model specifications, click on ‘Ok’ to proceed for results (Figure 3 below).

Now ARIMA (1, 1, 1) results will appear, as the figure below shows.

Use 5E25A5EE63214 to save 5000 on 15001 - 20000 words standard order of literature survey service.

ARIMA results can be analyzed through several components.

Log-likelihood: The log-likelihood component of the ARIMA model should be high, like in the present case. The value of log-likelihood (ignoring negative sign) is 554. This is sufficiently high. Compare the log-likelihood value of different ARIMA models and select the one which has the highest.

Coefficient of AR: The coefficient of AR should be less than 1 and at least a 5% level of significance. Here, the coefficient of AR is significant at 5% (0.000) but is close to 1 (0.98967). This suggests that differenced time series GDP may still be non-stationary. Therefore, compare different ARIMA models based on the coefficients of AR and MA, their value (if close to zero), and their significance.

AIC/BIC: The value of ‘AIC’ and ‘BIC’ should be lowest in comparison to other ARIMA models. The value of AIC/BIC is usually the reverse of the log-likelihood function. Therefore instead of log-likelihood, compare different ARIMA models based on the value of AIC/BIC. The ARIMA model with the lowest AIC/BIC value will be more appropriate for forecasting.

Similarly, to compare the applicability of ARIMA (1,1,1) calculate the next ARIMA model (1,1,2) to compare these two models.

### Test 2: ARIMA (1,1,2)

Again fill the values in ARIMA specifications as per (1, 1, 2). After selecting the values for ARIMA model specifications, click on ‘OK’ to proceed for results (Figure 5).

The figure below shows the results for ARIMA (1,1,2).

ARIMA results as presented in above Figure 6 can be analyzed through several components, as below:

Log-likelihood: the value of log-likelihood (ignoring negative sign) is 552 which is similar to the previous ARIMA model (1, 1, 1).

Coefficient of AR: The coefficient of AR and MA are significant but the coefficient of AR is insignificant at 5%. This suggests that differenced time series GDP may still be non-stationary. Therefore, similar to the previous model, ARIMA (1,1,2) also is not appropriate for forecasting.

AIC/BIC: The value of AIC and BIC is less than the previous model but only up to 1 point.  Therefore, no significant difference between ARIMA (1,1,1) and (1,1,2) can be seen. Thus both are inappropriate for forecasting time series GDP.

Test the remaining ARIMA models with different specifications following the same procedures (Figures 1, 2, and 3). Then click on ‘OK’ for results.

## Comparison of all ARIMA Models

This section presents a comparison of all ARIMA forecasting models mentioned in Table 1. Values of AR and MA coefficients, their significance, and values of AIC and BIC are evaluated.