How to master the art of critical writing in your research?

I started professional writing over 7 years ago when writing rules were simpler. There were only a handful of technical aspects to master in order to be a good researcher: be familiar referencing styles, get good data, use impeccable grammar, avoid plagiarism and write well. But after years of being used to writing this way, suddenly a wave of unexpected changes hit me: universities wanted to see more technical writing skills in students. Client feedback on my work started changing; supervisors no longer fussed over petty issues like a missing comma in List of References. Obviously, I had to modify my writing habits. Though I didn’t face much difficulty adapting to the other changes (like quicker deadlines and using new software and testing methods for analysis), the biggest challenge was to learn critical writing.

Critical writing, in technical terms, means “not necessarily writing about the topic in a negative way; it is simply making sure that you have considered all sides of the argument” (University of Cumbria, UK). Sounds simple? It definitely isn’t. Here I have listed the 3 most important lessons I learnt in the process of mastering critical writing.

Lesson# 1: At first, you will fail

First lesson of critical writing; " you will fail".

The first time I was asked for a critical evaluation was in a dissertation. At that time there was little guidance on the hows and whys of critical writing; and most blogs on it were cryptic. I took 3 days to write a 600-word critical review of the topic. By the end of which my brain was scrambled eggs and confidence level at an all-time low. After hesitantly submitting it to my client, I decided not to wait for the feedback before I attempted critical writing again. The feedback came soon: it was not impressive and client was asked to rewrite the whole part.

Lesson# 2: Never criticize a report before knowing the basics

Never criticise a report before knowing the basics

When my first time was (expectedly) a disaster, I sought help from a dear colleague who immediately penned an article on how to do a critical review. In addition, she said 10 wise words to me: focus on the Who, When, Where, Why, How and What. I followed a few simple steps in my second try:

  • Gathered 8-10 latest reports on the topic, published in renowned journals.
  • Focused on 6 main elements of each report:
    1. Who wrote it?
    2. When was it written/researched/ published? (preferably not older than 4 years)
    3. Where was it written? If the report is set in a location that is demographically and geographically too different from yours then its relevance diminishes.
    4. How was the research conducted?
    5. Why was the report written? (Knowing the aim of the research is important)
    6. What was studied in the report?

I wrote the information in bits and pieces and arranged them in a logical order before I started to criticise it. This gave me clarity and ease in writing.

Lesson# 3: Negative points are not always essential.

Caution Pool Drained.

When we think of the word “critic”, we quickly assume that he/she would have more negative things to say than positive. This isn’t always the case. A critic reviewing a movie or food would focus on the pluses as much as the minuses in order to form a realistic and unbiased opinion. The same applies to critical writing. On my fourth or fifth try, I summarised the author’s perception before passing my judgment on whether or not I agreed with the author. I reasoned my opinions well. This cautious approach paid off well as the supervisor was happy with my reasoning.

Last but not the least, practice leads to perfection. It is impossible to perfect the task of critical writing overnight, but follow a few simple rules creatively and you too will get the hang of it soon enough.

Priya Chetty

Partner at Project Guru
Priya is a master in business administration with majors in marketing and finance. She is fluent with data modelling, time series analysis, various regression models, forecasting and interpretation of the data. She has assisted data scientists, corporates, scholars in the field of finance, banking, economics and marketing.

Related articles

  • How to write critical review in a dissertation? Dissertation writing is an important part of most post graduation and doctorate programs. Dissertation is basically a research that is intended to test the student’s ability to apply the theory into practice.
  • How to become a professional academic writer? The meaning of ‘academic writing’ is simple; writing of academic assignments and projects like reports, essays, journal papers, theses and dissertations. Outsourcing academic projects is a worldwide industry today.
  • Writing guidelines to help improve your research work It is commonly misconceived that academic writing is simply about presenting the topic-related data. It is important to understand that academic writing is different from non academic or commercial writing and has its own set of rules.
  • What is referencing? Referencing is an essential part in any academic paper. It is important that you cite the source of your borrowed idea and quote. By providing the source you are acknowledging in your paper that you have read the work and have recognized the referred author's ideas.
  • New methods to improve academic writing skills You must be aware that universities around the world are becoming stricter by the day about the quality of student assignments and dissertations/ theses. Consequently the rules of academic writing are changing too.


We are looking for candidates who have completed their master's degree or Ph.D. Click here to know more about our vacancies.