What is the difference between systematic review and critical review?

Systematic review intends to find out the appropriate answers to the questions that have been developed in accordance with the research problem in a study. Thus, in accomplishing this objective, scholars implementing systematic review simply collect and present all the relevant scholarly evidence that confer to the eligibility criteria of an academic study.

On the other hand, the function of the critical review is to make a critical assessment of a research idea proposed in a study by comparing various scholarly studies that have been already undertaken in the subject. Basically, the critical review presents the perspective of the researcher regarding a study based on what he already knows and what has been further understood from a critical analysis of the selected empirical information related to the topic.


The specific applicability of systematic review is in those fields of study where lots of previous works have been made and data have got generated as a consequence. Thus, in such situations, the significance of systematic review is to precisely consolidate and define the subject of study by examining and generating an exhaustive list of most recent empirical works on the subject.
Critical review, on the other hand, is applied in those fields of study where detailed discussion on a specific topic of research has to be made to generate a precise and accurate conclusion to the research problem. Thus, both explicit and implicit evaluations of all the empirical studies that have already been done on the research problem under scrutiny have to be done for the purpose to streamline the findings.


The process that is implemented for carrying out systematic review starts from framing the specific question related to the research topic around which empirical data have to be collected. Then, the most relevant works on the research questions have to be identified and collected as per their point of relevancy. Next is the assessment of the quality of the collected empirical sources is made based on:

  • their relevancy,
  • recentness,
  • amount of data present in the sources that are related to the topic of study and
  • quality of references used.

Furthermore, the research conclusions drawn in such empirical sources are summarized. Finally, present the interpretations of the consolidated findings to generate answers to the research questions.

Process of systematic review

The process of systematic review

When a researcher intends to implement a critical review, the main argument that is being projected is focused upon. Therefore, the main areas of the argument and the main idea that have been presented are identified. Then researches on other empirical works that focus on this central idea of the research at hand are identified. Furthermore, the relevancy of these collected works with the research are assessed by emphasizing upon their:

  • recentness,
  • quality of references used and,
  • relevancy with the research at hand.

Here it should be noted that in critical review, the type of data that the selected empirical sources offer is a cardinal criterion for streamlining the sources. Moreover, comparison of the scholarly comments present in these empirical sources is analyzed from various standpoints so that a critical study of the research topic can be done. Finally, the perspectives of the researcher are compared with the information gathered from the critical review of the scholarly sources to draw a final conclusion to the research topic.

Process of critical review

The process of critical review

How to select an appropriate type of review method?

When the topic of research is extensive and broad and lots of previously available empirical data enhance the extensiveness of such a research topic, even more, a need is felt to implement a systematic review to consolidate the findings. Say, for example, a study is undertaken on the prevention of obesity during childhood. Since there are lots of previously encoded empirical data on the topic, it becomes essential for the researcher to consolidate the sources based on their relevance, recentness and quality of data present in these sources. On the other hand, when the research topic becomes more focused and aims at finding out if dietary regime followed by children during childhood has any relation to childhood obesity then a critical review of various scholarly sources have to be made. This is because critical review at this stage gives the researchers the necessary information that helps in understating if dietary regime during childhood can really be established as a factor influencing childhood obesity.

Tabular presentation of the systematic review and critical review

Systematic review
Critical review
Types of studies
Used in studies that cover broader topics like child obesity, primary healthcare, and so on. Used in studies that are much focused on nature like the role of diet in child obesity, the significance of hospital infrastructure in primary healthcare, etc.
The systematic review is generally arranged in a chronological manner based on their date of publication.  But no comparison of one source with the other is made. The critical review is arranged in descending order based on their date of publication. Nevertheless, a focal point of one empirical source is found out and then compared with the one that appears next in order to estimate the similarities and differences in the perspectives of the scholars.
The systematic review is ideal for research topics that are broader in nature and have been studied from that broader perspective by many scholars. The critical review is applicable in studies where there are contradictory views of different scholars on a particular research topic.
A researcher must always select the most recent sources for conducting a systematic review of a topic The selection of sources for critical review must be such that they cover a long span of time to show how the research topic has improvised and become precise over the time. Moreover, each of the sources should be critically reviewed.
A researcher is not supposed to compare and contrast between empirical studies that have been referenced in a research A researcher cannot present sources randomly one after the other in the critical review instead of making the critical estimation.
Importance and relevance
The systematic review is important in creating a database on a topic of research by consolidating most significant and most recent sources. The critical review is ideal for deriving at a conclusion when the research topic is focused on nature and subjected to debatable perspectives of different scholars.

Apara Bhattacharya

Research analyst at Project Guru
Ardent passion has helped Apara into a career that involves writing on varied subjects and expressing different contemporary issues around the World. A Masters in English and a diploma in Business English are her academic strengths that have helped her in shaping her career as an analyst. She started her career with an NGO that imparts soft skills and communicative English. Her association with reputed research firms of India gave her a break as a researcher scholar was .
Apara Bhattacharya

Related articles

  • Systematic review of literature A systematic literature review attempts ‘to identify, appraise and summarise all the empirical evidence. Evidence must meet pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a given research question. A systematic review of literature helps to develop the study that allows identification, […]
  • How to write critical review in a dissertation? Dissertation writing is an important part of most post graduation and doctorate programs. Dissertation is basically a research that is intended to test the student’s ability to apply the theory into practice.
  • Learn how to empirically review the literature Empirical research according to Penn State University is based on “observed and measured phenomenon and derives the knowledge from actual experience rather than from theory or belief”.
  • Critically review or analyze literature in a research paper Critical review means you are identifying the problems or weaknesses of a previous research. That is the meaning of the word “critic”. For example, the job of a food critic is to criticise food served to him.
  • PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses The PRISMA framework or Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), is a set of guidelines or steps developed by Moher.


We are looking for candidates who have completed their master's degree or Ph.D. Click here to know more about our vacancies.