MANET (Mobile Ad Hoc networks) are the wireless networks which work without any specific infrastructure. MANET routes make use of nodes without a central access point. These nodes witness constant movement and sometimes the information flows from multiple nodes, causing congestion in networks. Therefore, to control the congestion issue and reduce unpredictability from MANET networks, there is a need to build an efficient routing protocol.

Many routing protocols have been built and applied over decades. They were either proactive or reactive. However as the complexity of networks grew, hybrid networks started being developed. Today there is a vast array of hybrid routing protocols in MANETs. Academic research has compared proactive and reactive routing protocols to find out which one is most efficient for communication. However, there has been little attention given to hybrid routing protocols. Such a comparison is warranted to assess different routing protocols' limitations and identify a more advanced method of addressing mobile sensor network traffic issues. The protocols could be simulated using a Network simulator (NS3 or NS2).

The purpose of this module is to compare hybrid, proactive and reactive routing protocols in MANET. The performance metrics for comparison of the routing protocols will be throughput, packet delivery ratio, packet loss, delay, drop packet, and routing overhead. The module focuses on a selection of optimal protocol based on the criteria that there is a rise in throughput performance, routing overhead and packet delivery ratio; and a reduction in packet loss, drop packet and delay. The packet delivery ratio should be at least 85%. Routing protocol fulfilling the performance metrics requirement will tend to have the best performance and major role in the transmission of data effectively.

Goal 1

Goal 1- To determine the parameters and routing protocols which contribute to affecting the MANET network performance

Purpose: The dataset of MANET networks consists of different parameters like phy, channel, topography dimension, propagation, antenna, simulator, simulation time, number of nodes, amount of traffic, node speed, node movement, maximum packets, packet size, and protocol details. The selection of parameters influences defining the performance of MANET networks. To build a more optimal MANET network the need is to know which are the most popular and suitable routing protocols and also understand which parameters are most effective for the particular routing protocol. Thus, this goal will examine past studies which explored the routing protocols for MANET networks.

Method: Systematic review of 40-50 studies which show development of routing protocols. Systematic review tables will contain the following details of each study.

  • Author name
  • Paper title
  • Aim of study
  • Study type
  • Simulation tool
  • Dataset properties
  • Parameters
  • Data analysis methods
  • Findings of study
  • The existing gap in the study
  • Future scope
  • Publication year

Requirements: Sound knowledge of MANET networks and systematic review.

Milestones

To contribute and publish select a pending milestone.

Completed

There are no completed milestones.

Pending
Review of the methods for evaluating MANET performance
Systematic review of the use of Routing protocols with MANET for improving performance
Parameters suitable for routing protocols used with MANET for improving performance
Comparison of performance for different routing protocols usage with MANET
Review of hybrid routing protocols' contribution to improving MANET performance
Goal 2

Goal 2- To compare the routing protocol and identify the most optimal routing protocol for reducing congestion and transmitting the data effectively

Purpose: Using the NS2 or NS3 simulator, compare the performance of different routing protocols. Herein, the purpose is to select the most optimal set of parameters for each of the routing protocols and then compare the performance of all the routing protocols using performance metrics with selected parameters. With the comparison of all 3 types of routing protocols i.e. proactive, reactive and hybrid; the optimal routing protocol can be selected which would help in improving mobile sensor networks performance.

Method: Parameters selection will be based only on the results derived from Goal 1. The main criteria is to select the best performing routing protocol with packet delivery ratio of more than 85% only to minimize the loss of information from the transmission of data. The data analysis procedure would include simulation of data using NS2 or NS3 simulation by specifying parameters and routing protocols. Once the routing protocol is applied, then performance metrics values for throughput, packet delivery ratio, packet loss, delay, drop packet, and routing overhead need to be derived. The most optimal parameters for each routing protocol will be identified by comparing different performance metrics, followed by the selection of the protocol with the best performance. The procedure of building in the routing protocol is as follows.

Step 1 – setting the simulation design

  • Step 2- setting the test design
  • Step 3- routing protocol setting
  • Step 4- running NS2 or NS3 simulation
  • Step 5 – Generating in the trace file
  • Step 6 – Analyzing the performance of the routing protocol with each parameter i.e throughput, packet delivery ratio, packet loss, delay, drop packet, and routing overhead
  • Step 7 – Deriving Optimized algorithm for each routing protocol
  • Step 8 – Comparing all the formulated routing protocols' performance
  • Step 9 – Discussing the utility of the optimized algorithm

Requirements: Prior knowledge or experience with the NS2 or NS3 simulator and familiarity with the concept of MANET and routing protocols is a must to accomplish the milestones of this goal.

Milestones

To contribute and publish select a pending milestone.

Completed

There are no completed milestones.

Pending
A conceptual framework development for comparing and identifying the optimal routing protocol for improving MANET performance
Implementation of proactive routing protocols for improving MANET performance
Implementation of reactive routing protocols for improving MANET performance
Implementation of hybrid routing protocols for improving MANET performance
Comparison of routing protocols to optimize MANET performance