Abstract and summary is the short version summarizing and describing the contents of a paper. They comprise of the same context but are different in a few ways. They provide the first impression of a paper and act as a preface to answer the reader’s questions;
- What has been done in the paper?
- How has it been done?
- What is the research about?
- Why has it been done?
- What were the findings?
Things to consider
Abstract or summary is an important part is written at the beginning of a paper. However, they are always written after the completion of a project. Another aspect is that abstracts and summaries never include citations or references. They must be simple and easy to understand and should answer the questions mentioned in the above section. An abstract and summary must cover the complete research in a maximum of 1000 words. However, abstracts are usually limited to 500 words, summaries of 1000 words are usually termed as ‘Executive summaries’. If the paper is a scientific article, then write an abstract of a maximum of 300 words and a minimum of 150 words. The following points should be kept in mind while writing the abstract or the summary of a study:
- the background or introduction
- the rationale of the paper
- aim of the research
- literature reviews (only in case of summary and executive summary)
- conceptual framework (in case of summary and executive summary)
- methods used
- findings of the research
- conclusions and limitations
Things not to include
- Lengthy background or contextual information.
- Redundant phrases, unnecessary adverbs and adjectives, and repetitive information.
- Acronyms or abbreviations.
- References to other literature.
- Using incomplete sentences and symbols.
- Jargon or terms that may be confusing to the reader.
- Citations to other works.
- Any sort of image, illustration, figure, or table, or references.
Difference between abstract and summary
|Type of paper||Journals, Essays, and Masters’ Thesis||Thesis and Dissertations for PhD and Masters’|
|No. of words and length (pages)||150 to 300 words;|
A quarter of page to one page abstract
|300 to 1000 words;|
One page to four page summary or executive summary
|Contents||Aim of the study, problem statement, methods, findings and limitations of the research||Aim and objectives, background, literature review, problem statement, methods, findings, conclusions and limitations|
|Use of keywords||Abstracts in scientific papers usually comprise of keywords||No keywords needed|
|Type||Critical and descriptive||Descriptive and informative|
Steps to follow
- First, complete the whole research and the writing of the paper.
- Extract the information.
- Plan the type of abstract or summary; informative, descriptive or critical. Informative are usually lengthy and briefly describes all the chapters of a thesis or dissertation. Descriptive comprises of only goals and findings of the study, and critical presents only findings of research papers.
- Provide information on aim, problem statement, methods, findings and conclusions of the main paper.
- Repeat the process and check if any important information is missing.
- Cross-check with the questions mentioned in the earlier section of the article.
Aim of the study
(AIM) The main aim of the current paper was to find the different aspects of abstract and a summary.
(PROBLEM STATEMENT) It was, however, found that there are certain differences between an abstract and a summary. Moreover, summaries are extended parts of abstracts. Therefore, it is important to assess the different aspects and the difference between an abstract and a summary.
(BACKGROUND) It is the short version summarizing and describing the contents of a journal or a dissertation or thesis. Abstract and summary comprise of the same context but are different in a few ways. They provide the first impression of a research paper.
(METHODS) The current paper compares different samples of abstracts and summaries from different journal papers and theses. A sample of 5 different journals and 5 different theses was explored to find the difference between them.
(FINDINGS) There is a significant difference between abstract and summary on the basis of
(CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS) The current study found the presence of a significant difference. However, the study has certain limitations which need to be addressed in future for better understanding the difference between abstract and summary. The limitations
Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a method of estimating the risks of investing in a particular stock. It is mainly used by financial analysts and investors to decide what price they should pay for a particular stock. It was first used and developed by Harry Markowitz in 1952. Harry described the relationship between an investor’s risk and the expected return in CAPM. According to Markowitz, (2008), “the expected return of a particular security or a portfolio is equal to the rate on a risk-free security plus a risk premium. If the security or portfolio does not meet or exceed the required return, then the investment should not be entered into” (pg. 91). It means that, if Stock A is riskier than Stock B, the price of Stock A should be lower to compensate investors for taking on the increased risk.Read more »
In the previous article, different data types and challenges faced while conducting momentum of daily returns remain presented. There are different methods of calculating the momentum of stock prices. Each type of calculation depends on the type of data being used. Stock exchange experts use different tools to find the momentum of stocks, however, MS Excel is one the best methods. Apart from that, the STATA software package can be used for assessment of momentum investing.
Momentum analysis is mainly done to measure the rate of rise or fall in stock prices (Sehgal and Jain, 2011). It is a method to show the trend of daily stocks and prices over time. Momentum analysis is applied only on financial stock prices of companies or stock portfolios. The use of momentum analysis dates back to the early 1990s, when a paper analyzing the momentum of stock returns on U.S. equities was presented for the period 1963-1990.Read more »
‘Limitations or shortcomings of the study’ is the last stage of a thesis. After the study is completed, as a researcher, you may have identified shortcomings. Enlisting those areas in the thesis serves many purposes.
Identifying limitations or shortcomings in a study means that you have carefully considered their potential impact on your findings. So, when readers frame an opinion about your study, they know the conditions under which your findings are valid. Secondly, it establishes the credibility of your research. No study is complete without its set of limitations. Therefore identifying these limitations formally acknowledges that your research was carried out ethically. Finally, it establishes the validity of the research.Read more »
The PRISMA framework or Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), is a set of guidelines or steps developed by Moher, (2013). These steps are useful for systematic literature reviews, critical literature analyses and meta-analyses. The PRISMA tool or framework uses a set of methods to systematically search papers and literature for review based studies. In addition, PRISMA is also based on the formulated inclusion and exclusion criteria in any type of study that systematically assesses the quality of chosen papers and either includes for the study or excludes for the study.Read more »
The part “scope for further research” is essential in every academic study such as a thesis, dissertation or journal paper. The main purpose of this part is to make the readers aware of the findings emerging from the study, and shortcomings. The shortcomings or the research gap guide for future researchers on a domain that they must consider to save time and avoid repetitive outcomes.Read more »
Chicago Manual of Style referencing or more commonly the Chicago referencing style was incepted in 1906 by the University of Chicago Press (University of Chicago, 2017). It follows two styles: note & bibliography and the author-date system. Note and bibliography comprise of numerical in-text citations and footnoting bibliography [e.g. Chicago manual of referencing1], and mainly followed by authors of literature, history, and the arts.Read more »