Slacks based measure (SBM) is a nonradial model to solve the problem in the “additive model” developed by Charnes, Cooper, & Rhodes in 1978. This model can discriminate between efficient and inefficient DecisionMaking Units (DMU). However it does not provide an efficiency measure, so a decision maker cannot interpret the performance of the DMU. Therefore “super SBM” model was introduced to determine and rank efficient DMU. The efficiency scores are dimensionless and fall between 0 and 1, thus allowing for the comparison of different DMU in terms of efficiency.
Why SBM model?
SBM model uses “slacks” to show excess input and shortfalls in the output then it directly deals with them by maximizing these slacks. SBM analysis provides an efficiency score which is unitsinvariant and a monotone function of input slacks and output slacks. To rank efficiency, super SBM was introduced by Tone & Tsutsui (2001b). It is appropriate for evaluating efficiencies when inputs and outputs may change nonproportionally.
Super SBM model can be expanded by the super efficiency to the DEA models. Super efficiency rate refers to the distance between the inputs and outputs of both units. The distance is shown in variable ρ. Assuming that there exist a set of ‘n’ DMU producing the same set of outputs which consume the same set of inputs. Input and output matrix is matrix (X, Y), where (Input) X= (x_{ij}) ϵ R^{mxn }and (Output) Y= (y_{ij}) ϵ R^{sxn}.
Equations of the SBM model
λ is a nonnegative vector in R^{n}. The vector S^{–} ϵ R^{m }and S^{+} ϵ R^{s}, shows an excess input and a short falling output, respectively. The equation for the SBM model is as follows:
Suppose (ρ^{*}, λ^{*},s^{*}, s^{+*}) is the optimal condition for SBM analysis and (x_{0 }, y_{0}) is SBM efficient of DMU. When ρ* = 1, s^{*}=0 and s^{+*}=0 (or there is no excess input and a short falling output). A superefficiency model helps in ranking DMU. Below is the formula for super SBM analysis:
Challenges of super SBM model
One of the major challenges in super SBM model is that it involves solving a complex equation. This becomes more tedious when there are large units of input and outputs. It takes a lot of effort and time to estimate the efficiency of different decisionmaking units manually. Therefore, it is optimal to use statistical packages like DEA solver, max DEA, and others. They are more popular than manual calculations and other measures of evaluating efficiency.
Interpretation of super SBM analysis results
This module shows the following process in determining efficiency for 10 DMU and ranks them on the basis efficiency by using Super SBM model. It uses MaxDEA software to assess efficiency. MaxDEA 7 basic is available free of cost, however, the ‘pro’ version is a paid software.
Input and output dataset for 10 DMU
OUTPUT 
INPUT 

DMU 
Exports percentage of GDP 
Export 
Importtariff 
Exchange rates 

1  68.12  3,069,559.00  2.27  30.73  
2  19.99  3,488,123.37  1.70  1.04  
3  29.67  3,696,265.19  5.02  0.64  
4  100.63  4,138,413.19  1.35  3.67  
5  45.40  4,736,995.93  3.79  0.75  
6  75.63  4,984,467.88  1.72  3.15  
7  53.88  6,682,944.91  3.96  1,094.85  
8  24.50  13,177,694.49  3.04  6.20  
9  15.92  13,544,244.95  3.54  97.60  
10  13.64  23,869,948.68  2.65  1.00 
By using maxDEA software and applying super SBM model, efficiency score for all DMU can be determined and ranked. DEASBM model is nonradial and nonoriented and can deal with inputs and outputs individually. The purpose is to minimize the input and output slacks, resulting in this fractional program.
Efficiency scores and ranking from super SBM model
DMU 
Score 
Rank 
1  0.248082  8 
2  0.541691  6 
3  0.651521  5 
4  1  1 
5  1  1 
6  0.796988  4 
7  0.151898  10 
8  0.359254  7 
9  0.227246  9 
10  1  1 
Determining the efficiency score of DMU
The results show that DMU4, DMU5, and DMU6 are the most efficient decisionmaking units achieving highest efficiency score of 1. The efficiency score of all other DMUs is less than 1 in DEASBM models. It reflects these DMUs have input excesses and output shortfalls. This analysis can be used in yearly data. The mean efficiency score for specific DMU over a period of time and year time efficiency can be evaluated too.
References
 Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/03772217(78)901388.
 Düzakın, E., & H Düzakın. (2007). Measuring the performance of manufacturing firms with super slacks based model of data envelopment analysis: An application of 500 major industrial enterprises in. Elsevier. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221706009593.
Rashmi Sajwan
Latest posts by Rashmi Sajwan (see all)
 Establishing a relationship between FDI and air pollution in India  November 4, 2018
 How to test normality in STATA?  October 31, 2018
 How to test time series multicollinearity in STATA?  October 24, 2018
Discuss